Skip to content

Old, But Not That Old: Debunking the Myth of Ancient Cockroaches

Gyna lurida

This cockroach (Gyna lurida) is not a fossil, but it shares a family with one of the oldest known cockroach fossil specimens, “Gyna” obesa, which is the earliest known member of the family Blaberidae, alive 50 million years ago and found in France, where no Blaberidae exist today. (Photo credit: Dominic Anthony Evangelista, Ph.D.)

By Dominic Anthony Evangelista, Ph.D. and Manpreet Kohli

Cockroaches are not 300 million years old. They might not even be 200 million years old. In fact, the oldest cockroaches known from the fossil record are only 125-140 million years old, hardly the ancient and immortal beasts claimed by some.

In our new paper published in Palaeontologica Electronica, a review of the oldest cockroach fossils known to science, we debunk the misconception that cockroaches have been around since the Carboniferous Period. Currently, the oldest known cockroach fossils, Valditermes brennae and Cretaholocompsa montsecana, are from somewhere around the end of the Jurassic and beginning of the Cretaceous (circa 120-130 million years ago).

There are ancient cockroach-like fossils from almost 150 million years earlier than the oldest know cockroach fossil, but these are not cockroaches. Not anymore than this elegant praying mantis is a cockroach. In fact, this mantis is more closely related to the cockroaches of today than the “roachoids” from 300 million years ago. The roachoid fossils are more likely part of the group from which both mantises and cockroaches originated. However, the name roachoid can be confusing since it implies relatedness to cockroaches.

Our study applies high scientific standards set by the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center’s Fossils Calibration Database Working Group to assess which fossils are correctly classified as cockroaches. In doing so, we determined that only 25 percent of the oldest cockroach fossils could be correctly attributed to a known group of cockroach. This was because the fossils were preserved without the information necessary to determine what kind of cockroach they were or, sometimes, even if they were cockroaches at all.

Some fossil cockroaches are valid, though. The oldest one, Cretaholocompsa montsecana, lived in a Cretaceous version of modern day Spain. Another, “Gyna” obesa, which is the earliest known member of the family Blaberidae, was alive 50 million years ago and could be found in France, where no Blaberidae exist today. Two others are preserved in the Green River fossil deposits from Colorado, USA, and are only about 40 million years old.

The dates of these fossils indicate that most of the 7,000 species of cockroaches alive today probably originated after the extinction of the dinosaurs. Cockroaches almost certainly existed in the Cretaceous and Jurassic periods, too, but most of those lineages appear to have gone extinct. That said, all of the statistical analyses that have incorporated fossils to date the origin of cockroaches have used the fossils we believe are invalid, so the jury is very much still out on when certain groups originated. Others have stated that cockroaches probably cleaned up after dinosaurs, and our study indeed shows that cockroaches and dinosaurs shared the earth together.

We would also emphasize to other scientists that accurate fossil calibrations are important for understanding the chronological history of a group. We encourage all biologists to properly vet fossils that can be used as calibrations in their groups. For more details visit:

Dominic Anthony Evangelista, Ph.D., is a National Science Foundation postdoctoral research fellow at le Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle in Paris, France. For more about Dominic and his research, visit

Manpreet Kohli is pursuing her Ph.D. in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Rutgers University. She studies how fossil choice, fossil placement, and missing data affects the results of divergence-time analysis. Read more about Manpreet and her research at


  1. Yeah, yeah. Pedantic discrimination and fine toothing: You Entomologists created the narrow and exclusionary definition first, then determined whether the cockroach-fanciers fit your definition. It’s an old logic trick of Classifiers. The cockroach-fanciers have a much looser definition: ‘If it looks/acts like a cockroach then while it might or might not be a different species, it’s a (generic) cockroach or close-cockroach-ancestor.’ Relativism Rules.

  2. Bottom line, they’ve been around a lot longer than most of the species of life that exists today. Certainly long enough to adapt to a multitude of environments, and will likely be around after our ape brained species is gone…

  3. When your headline that reads, “Debunking the Myth of Ancient Cockroaches” is followed in the lead paragraph by, “In fact, the oldest cockroaches known from the fossil record are only 125-140 million years old,” it makes me want to question your frame of reference. “125-140 million years old” sounds really ancient to me. What am I missing?

  4. Thank you for sharing this, it’s an additional knowledge for me, I thought that roaches are more than 300 million years old but i guess it’s not

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.