The Eyes Have It: How Butterflies Navigate to Suitable Habitat

A recent study on butterflies’ navigation and visual perception tested the ability of Speyeria cybele butterflies, sometimes known as the great spangled fritillary, to reach an island habitat when released from up to 60 meters away. Some specimens eyes were flashed with bright light to induce blindness, resulting in significantly less success in navigation, which researchers say indicates a leading role of vision among other senses in butterfly navigation. (Photo credit: David Cappaert, Bugwood.org)
By Andrew Porterfield
For populations of any animal, the ability of far-flung members of a species to find the right habitat can be crucial to that species’ survival. How animals do this is an important question in ecology, and butterflies have proven a valuable model for studying how species members can individually find suitable living and feeding space.
But how butterflies detect and navigate their way to the right habitat remains something of a mystery. Past studies have released insects at various distances from a target habitat and studied flight behaviors, assuming certain limits to perception of these habitats. These studies have not examined how each type of sense—such as vision, olfaction, or wind perception—contribute to navigation, especially through unsuitable habitat.
To help answer this question, Zachary MacDonald, a Ph.D. student at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, led a research team that examined visual perception and navigation over water (an unsuitable habitat) to an island (a suitable habitat) in Ontario, Canada. The team published its results in June in the open-access Journal of Insect Science.

Zachary MacDonald, a Ph.D. student at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, led a research team that examined visual perception and navigation of butterflies over water (an unsuitable habitat) to an island (a suitable habitat) in Lake of the Woods in Ontario, Canada. (Photo courtesy of Zachary MacDonald)
MacDonald and his team found that, in the butterfly species Speyeria cybele and Speyeria atlantis (sometimes known as the great spangled fritillary and the Atlantis fritillary, respectively), visual perception was the primary sense used to navigate to habitats. In addition, his team found no “outer” distance beyond which the butterflies could not find their way home; instead, their homing ability depended on several environmental and other factors.
The team’s experiments consisted of two parts:
First, the researchers collected 41 S. cybele and 54 S. atlantis butterflies and released them from a motorboat, at various distances from a 2.5-acre target island in Lake of the Woods, Ontario. The release distances were 30, 40, 50, or 60 meters. Each insect was visually tracked until it reached the target island or flew out of range.
Then, to determine the role of vision in the butterflies’ trek for habitat, the researchers induced flash blindness, exposing a select group of butterflies’ compound eyes to intense photographic flashes before they were released. The flash bleached rhodopsin compounds in the insect eyes, effectively blinding them.
Unflashed butterflies overall reached the target island, but their navigation ability decreased as their release distance increased. At 60 meters, half of the S. cybeles reached their destination, while at 50, 40, and 30 meters, 54.5 percent, 85.7 percent and 80 percent succeeded, respectively. In comparison, no S. atlantis insects succeeded from 60 meters. Their success was 16.7 percent at 50 meters, and half at 40 and 30 meters.
For flash-blinded butterflies, only 11 percent of S. cybeles and no S. atlantis could navigate to the island.
The decrease in navigation ability with increased distance from the island was not a surprising finding. But the effectiveness of flash blindness on navigation was unexpected, MacDonald says. “I was surprised at how effective the flash method was at inducing flash blindness and rendering butterflies unable to detect the nearby habitat patch. The effect was so obvious that, at times, it felt silly using statistics to draw our most basic inferences—a simple bar plot shows it all! After we induced flash blindness, butterflies could still fly effectively (i.e., stay above the lake surface and maintain elevation), but couldn’t find a nearby patch of habitat, even if it was within 20 meters of them. By contrast, unflashed butterflies navigated successfully to the patch almost every time.”

The proportion (success rate) of Speyeria cybele and Speyeria atlantis butterflies that successfully navigated to a target island after experimental release at 30, 40, 50, and 60 meters was significantly lower in butterflies exposed to a series of intense flashes immediately before release, to induce blindness. “Reduced success rates of flashed butterflies indicate that butterflies rely primarily on visual senses to detect and navigate to suitable habitat patches during interpatch and dispersal movements,” the research team that conducted the experiment writes. (Figure originally published in MacDonald et al 2019, Journal of Insect Science)
While MacDonald’s team studied navigation in just two species, he believes the findings could apply to other butterflies. “The further away a butterfly is from a habitat patch, the less likely it will be to successfully navigate to the habitat patch. However, specific distances at which individuals might consistently navigate is likely contingent on many variables, unique to the environmental, landscape, and possibly even the individual,” he says.
The study, while indicating visual perception is a very strong factor in successful navigation, may not entirely rule out the role of other butterfly senses.
“It is certainly possible that butterflies employ other senses for long-range detection of particular resources, including nectar and host plants, so long as the attractive odor is in sufficient quantity and the individual is able to quantify the direction of the wind,” MacDonald says. “Based on our work, I would say that butterflies may use olfaction in certain instances to gain approximate information on the location of nectar and host plant resources but that their actual navigation of fragmented landscape (at scales they are most likely to encounter) is likely accomplished with use of visual senses.”
Andrew Porterfield is a writer, editor, and communications consultant for academic institutions, companies, and nonprofits in the life sciences. He writes frequently about agriculture issues for the Genetic Literacy Project. He is based in Camarillo, California. Follow him on Twitter at @AMPorterfield or visit his Facebook page.
This article caught my eye because of the fritillary image. The under wing looks exactly one of several possible fritillaries here in New Mexico. Identifying fritillaries like many other butterflies can be very challenging to be sure.
At any rate the study described in the article was interesting, but I felt it was a very simplistic in assessing the butterfly’s ability to navigate to an island from a maximum of 80 meters. Butterflies often travel much further especially the migratory species like monarchs and painted ladies.
Studying butterfly migration is very challenging so I don’t mean to disparage the study, but it reflects how little is known about butterfly navigation. How to do such studies is the difficult aspect of studying butterflies.